I am 100% in agreement, AI is a tool and it does not rob us of our core facilities , if anything it enhances them 100x if used "correctly", ie intentionally and with judgement.
I will borrow your argument for JTP since it deals with exactly the kind of superficial objections I'm used to seeing everywhere these days, and that don't move the discussion in any meaningful way.
I’m thrilled to hear the JTP framework resonates with you. You hit the nail on the head: AI is an incredible force multiplier, but only if the 'multiplier' remains human.
Please, by all means, use the JTP argument. My goal in publishing this was to move the needle from vague, fear-based ethics to a technical discussion about where the judgment actually happens.
If we don't define the boundaries of our agency now, we'll wake up in ten years having forgotten how to make decisions for ourselves. I’d love to see how you apply these principles in your own field. Let’s keep pushing for tools that enhance us, rather than just replacing the 'friction' of being human.
I will borrow your argument for JTP since it deals with exactly the kind of superficial objections I'm used to seeing everywhere these days, and that don't move the discussion in any meaningful way.