Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

LLMs don't make bad tests any less harmful. Nor they write good tests for the stuff people mostly can't write good tests for.


Okay, but is aiming for 100% coverage really why the bad tests are bad?


In most cases I have seen bad tests, yes.


Aiming for 100% coverage is almost certain to cause bad tests, yes.

But not all bad tests come from a goal of 100% coverage.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: