LOL, nope. Those annotations must be part of the type system (e.g. `&mut T` in Rust) and must be checked by the compiler (the borrow checker). The language can provide escape hatches like `unsafe`, but they should be rarely used. Without it you get a fragile footgunny mess.
Just look at the utter failure of `restrict`. It was so rarely used in C that it took several years of constant nagging from Rust developers to iron out various bugs in compilers caused by it.
Does make me wonder what restrict-related bugs will be (have been?) uncovered in GCC, if any. Or whether the GCC devs saw what LLVM went through and decided to try to address any issues preemptively.
Possibly? LLVM had been around for a while as well but Rust still ended up running into aliasing-related optimizer bugs.
Now that I think about it some more, perhaps gfortran might be a differentiating factor? Not familiar enough with Fortran to guess as to how much it would exercise aliasing-related optimizations, though.
Just look at the utter failure of `restrict`. It was so rarely used in C that it took several years of constant nagging from Rust developers to iron out various bugs in compilers caused by it.