Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

YC was a child of its time though, right? Are you asking what could YC have done differently in the context of its history, or are you asking what a new accelerator started today would look like?

I ask because I’m not sure that now is the time for a new startup accelerator to succeed, and we have no way to predict the circumstances that are required for success without couching it in some major changes to externalities.



Great question; the latter, because as you mention, YC was a product of a moment in time and that moment has passed, but during that time horizon, they were very successful (imho).

Edit: YC says "Build something people want." and so I'm going to riff off of that in a bit of a meta way: "Support experiments worth conducting." The accelerator bit comes in once you've reached product market fit and need fuel for the rocket ship, but until then, you're just running an economic science experiment.


AFAICT, as much as YC was a child of their time, they (and PG) were also one of the parents of our current time.

I'm guessing it was inevitable that Wall Street would take over the field, and turn it into a machine.

And therefore it was also inevitable that people who, in the past, would've gone to Wall Street, now would flow into the space, and take it over.

But YC did put their own spin on that, in which the traditional affluent-family, prestigious-school kids could also be computer nerds.


It's interesting to consider what the evolution YC 2.0 could be. I do think we're going to be seeing more innovative organizational models that can be facilitated by adept use of AI.

For example, a network organization that hires individuals and small teams. The organization works on various projects and product streams, which which can be spun out as new businesses.

This is a flexible model that allows for many different outcomes and journeys for the people. Less of a startup factory and more of an enterprise garden.

I like the idea of gateways as a system for managing ideas and new business developments. Regular gateways every 6 or 12 months that assess projects for continuation, funding and further development. People can be involved in several projects.

I see this type of organization structure as a kind of 'hyper network'. By using AI to monitor and report on network activity it should be possible to have effective management oversight, direction and communication ... beneficent controlled creative chaos.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: