Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vileain's commentslogin

> tinygrad is following the <VILE_HUMAN> process for software: Make the requirements less dumb. The best part is no part.

Why reference <VILE_HUMAN>?

A simple search shows this "process" has been around as long as programming.

I'd bet Ada even said that shit at least once too.


"Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


As someone with no skin the game in either direciton, it's interesting that you're so triggered by the mere mention of someone's name.

Is it really so difficult to parse out different aspects of a person's existence, such that one could simultaneously appreciate some of the positives (the existence and success of SpaceX, making Tesla a success against the odds, [popularisation of] some engineering leadership concepts) while also acknowledging the negatives (of which, more latterly, there are many)?

Or must the sheer emotion always cloud out rational judgement?


There are lots of bubbles where Elon is still king. Those bubbles are often void of deodorant.

Based on the response it appears HN is one such bubble.

Elon spent billions to buy a platform and promote his tweets. He spent billions more to create a tweaked AI model that praised him like a mad king.

He only has to spend a couple thousand a month to influence comment ranking on HN.


the value is the directness, not implied origination

not everyone cares about playing voldemort


What is so aggrandizingly 'direct' about calling the system you are attempting to improve 'dumb'?

you have a more direct way?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: