Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | peutetre's commentslogin

> Jesse Lyu trusts his Tesla’s “self-driving” technology

Why? The guy he bought it from doesn't.

Musk says he is a technologist. Musk says he knows a lot about computers. Musk says the last thing he would do is trust a computer program:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/musk-pushes-debunked-...


The "but that's not the real Musk" game doesn't work anymore. They aren't "ill-advised" retweets. They are who and what he is. Increasingly they are all he is. Musk is the crank on Twitter.

Musk spends all day, every day showing you who and what he is. Believe him.

Here are two exercises for you:

1. Musk is keen on criticizing many governments, both foreign and domestic. Can you find for me a single criticism of the Chinese government from Musk?

2. Musk likes to spread conspiracy theories. Musk says he is a technologist. Musk says he knows a lot about computers. Musk says the last thing he would do is trust a computer program:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/musk-pushes-debunked-...

Can you reconcile Musk's position that he would never trust a computer program with his claim that Tesla has a full-self driving computer program that does full autonomy (this time for sure!) and everyone should trust it (it will save lives!) and buy it and rent it and hail a robotaxi?


1. Why are you singling out China? Are you racist against the Chinese?

2. He was explaining that you cannot trust a computer to authenticate voters, and he's right.

Are those two points really the best evidence you have that Musk is a "white supremacist"?


Please don't perpetuate flamewars on HN. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Okay, dang, my bad - I should never have replied to the comment in the first place.


[flagged]


We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines and ignoring multiple requests to stop.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


What is true matters more than your threats and your bans.


Indeed it does.


> 1. Why are you singling out China? Are you racist against the Chinese?

So that's a "no" then. How do you account for that?

> 2. He was explaining that you cannot trust a computer to authenticate voters, and he's right.

No, he was falsely claiming that the 2020 election was rigged by Dominion voting machines. You haven't managed to reconcile the disconnect here.

You failed both exercises. Do you want to try again?

I'll wait.


If you keep breaking the site guidelines like this, we're going to have to ban you. We've already asked you more than once not to.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


> A weak Europe is in the interest of those for whom regulation is an inappropriate limitation of their power

It is the natural instinct of oligarchs everywhere.

The solution is don't buy the products of the companies Musk is associated with.


The article talks about Musk's attacks on free speech, including his SLAPP lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate.


Sounds like he is fighting against a lawfare and censorship group with his own lawyers. I'm not sure how else he would counter them?


The more I hear about this Elon guy the less I like him.


Not many people use Emacs and the ones that do don't need support.


Ukraine would love it even more if Russia got out of their country.

The war can end tomorrow. All Russia needs to do is get out of Ukraine. All of it.

Easy to do, simple to achieve. No more Russians or North Koreans need to die.


> Trump told the court that TikTok was an important platform for his presidential campaign and that he should be the one to make the call on whether TikTok should remain in the US—not the Supreme Court.

That's all it comes down to really. Trump's interest ahead of any national interest.


The court was also very important for his campaign. So it’s really a no-brainer for them.


Then you have oligarchy.


That would make the answer "no". Putin's Russia will end with Putin because it has the same problem that all autocratic regimes have: succession.

After Putin, the oligarchs will scrabble about trying to get the most of what's left. If it gets really bad Russia will descend into civil war. Russia just recently had a mini-civil war with Prigozhin's rebellion.

If Russia ends up in civil war then China will invade Siberia under the guise of peace keeping to secure the resources it currently depends on from Russia.

China will cut deals with whichever oligarchs win out and part of the deal will be that China takes territory that they see as historically Chinese (such as Outer Manchuria).


China is unlikely to invade a failing state simply because it already has enough on its plate without trying to build some other nation too. We know this because to a large extent this is already what’s happening with Myanmar where rebels have seized control of border towns with China without so much as a peep.


Precisely this situation is unfolding in Myanmar right now. The junta is so weakened that they have no choice but to turn to China. Chinese troops will be in Myanmar soon to protect Chinese infrastructure investment:

https://www.rfa.org/english/opinions/2024/11/23/opinion-myan...

https://theconversation.com/chinese-security-companies-are-p...

https://www.voanews.com/a/china-backed-election-raises-fears...

If Russia decides to have a civil war, China will do the same in Russia.


The first article hardly has any sourcing and the second one is primarily quoting the first.


Myanmar is precisely the example. You could not have picked a better example to make my case.


There might be a power struggle, but a civil war? Nope. For that, you'd need (at least two) roughly equally matched adversaries controlling the armed forces. You don't see anything like that and such division doesn't spring up out of nothing.

China will also not invade Siberia, it's much easier to control it economically than turning your quasi-ally into a mortal enemy. (besides, nukes)


Another power center with strong military relatively uninvolved in Ukraine and with growing interest in taking controll is Chechnya.


> For that, you'd need (at least two) roughly equally matched adversaries controlling the armed forces.

Or you have a military weakened and degraded by a pointless war of choice in Ukraine.

And you have many armies controlled by oligarchs and warlords looking after their own interests (like Prigozhin).

And you have many separatist movements, such has for example a movement for Siberian independence.

And you have a power vacuum after the head of a mafia-style state is deposed or dies.

After Putin all bets are off.

Exactly this is happening in Myanmar right now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42572620


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: