Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | maxverse's commentslogin

The Gentleman is my go-to piano library to mess around! I have Noire and a few others, but have always loved its sound.

But also, yeah, NI is to music what... VS Code is to devs, right? Everyone uses/makes Kontakt libraries at some point.


> But also, yeah, NI is to music what... VS Code is to devs, right? Everyone uses/makes Kontakt libraries at some point.

IMO that would be Ableton Live. I have the MK3 finger drum and was thinking about buying a keyboard controller next. This makes me sad.


It's got just a nice warm tone to it. Noire is great too - I can play on that felt piano for hours!

Maybe I'm buying into the cool-aid, but I actually really liked the self-aware tone of this post.

> Based on our benchmarks, we are uniquely good at catching bugs. However, if all company blogs are to be trusted, this is something we have in common with every other AI code review product. One just has to try a few, and pick the one that feels the best.


> Today's agents are better than the median human code reviewer

"...at catching issues and enforcing standards, and they're only getting better".

I took this to mean what good code review is is subjective. But if you clearly define standards and patterns for your code, your linter/automated tools/ AI code reviewer will always catch more than humans.


Absolutely love this kind of project, combining different data sources to predict/model how you're doing. I also use chess as a proxy for my brain is working!


If anyone Googles it and is wondering about Feeling Good (1999) and Feeling Great (2020) by the same author, it seems like Feeling Great is just an updated version of the original book, based on more experience and new insights. Here's the author discussing the difference:

https://feelinggood.com/2020/10/26/213-from-feeling-good-to-...


It's crazy that it set off our alarms at the same time. One agreement -- oh, nice human. Two -- what is this!?


I love Addy's work, and enjoyed this article -- and I completely agree that it felt very LLM-y. I'm not sure what's scarier; that we know some of this didn't come from the author (and maybe that's okay?) or that one day soon, we'll get to a point where we won't be able to tell anymore.


This feels like a good second draft. There's definitely a message in here, but it shifts through the piece. To me, the most poignant sentence was " If I can just keep chugging forward, I will end up somewhere that is not here." I think the message is "Why are you working this hard? What do you hope to get out of participating in hustle culture; to what end?


So glad someone already spoke up about this -- I love Wired, and I think that piece is really poor (not because I love Ruby or think it's without fault, but because the argument it makes is essentially "it's not Ruby or Python, which have static typing tools.")


That Wired article might as well have been a GPT summary of the shit people have been saying about Ruby for two decades.

It is beyond stupid to continue to act like "it doesn't scale" is a real argument. Not every application is or will ever be Twitter.


Author has a history of bad-mouthing programming languages, that seems to be his meme: https://www.wired.com/author/sheon-han/


AI is helpful for this, but I also built https://www.hackterms.com eight years ago for this exact reason.


And of course good old Urban Dictionary: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=WAI


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: