Not knowing that an employee of a company broke the law and you're a director or more senior manager probably shoots down any chance of a due diligence defence.
Its not "obviously wrong" for flat earther. It always depend on the crowd
Same here in this thread and even top comment: HN crowd so its "obvious" that we should ban alt-right and "people like video x or y because it is controverial"
Well no. Some people just thing its ok and want to watch it and the line between fighting hate speech and censorship is very hard to draw
Education is not the same as work. Plus the point is that in most top uni there are a lot of competion some some criterias are always "unfair" because u need to lower the pool size quickly
Tbh you can see a conpiracy everywhere, even with your comment for example: you could be geniunely suspicious.
Or you could be a die hard trump supporter who prefer to say its suspicious because you don't like that attacking china whill lead in the future to attacking trump policy.
Well, if Trump say something about this topic on TV in the next couple of days, then I'm right. In any case, they promise to deliver a full report on that investigation in early 2019, hopefully it will be more informative. (My main point is not that the article might be politically motivated, but that its main statement is very imprecise and allows interpretations.)
I really hate these kind of arguments where some people have strong beliefs that "it would work" and not do it or invest themselves. Its like being in a pub and listening people talk about politics while neverhave had any responsibilities
Well the point is that its nice to see the world how you would like it to be instead of what it is. In practice some people are asshole, egoistical and take pleasure in it and i would argue life tend to reward that kind of behaviour (more money, more power and more girls). And they make fun of you.
