Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | malablaster's commentslogin

I’m disappointed at the lack of before/after photos in that article. My ape brain would love them.

You’d be hard pressed to convince me to consume a class 1 carcinogen in moderation for health benefits.


Class 1 just means "confirmed" with absolutely nothing stated about what the risk level is. You'd be hard pressed to convince me to make any decision based on that alone.


Cell byproducts are known carcinogen, and definitely ingested for health benefits (not for themselves, but en masse).


Sunlight is a class 1 carcinogen too. Dracula is the only person that avoids it.


I agree. There’s no need to centralize this list.


The graph you chose feels useless to me. It seems like you built this without a target use case, neither practical nor academic.


are you interested in steels? what do you think would be better?


When I’m buying a new knife I have a temporary interest in steels. For those times I might want something that guides me through whether there’s a steel that is better for my use case than Magnacut. Last time I was into researching steels I made my own spreadsheet.


I did this like 15 years ago for my personal site too! Looks great.


I’ve been paying for Kagi search engine (a thing I never thought I’d pay for) for many months and it has a lot of what you’re asking for.


I pay for Kagi Ultimate, and it does almost none of what OP asked for. The only thing you could say it does is searching curated content from other people they trust - that is fulfilled by the custom lens feature, since they can be shared.


Same here. Paying for Kagi, and I don't ever use Google for search now. No ads, no SEO shilling, I can curate my own search results, and it's fast.

That's a winner for me.


another paying (happy) Kagi customer here...


> by pooling data from 3 large cohorts, we could explore heterogeneity across key population subgroups, including understudied sociodemographic subgroups, which was identified as a research gap in the 2022 USPSTF review.3 In stratified analyses, we found no evidence of effect modification by race and ethnicity, education, or diet quality.


If they don’t want them anymore why not just lay them off? Why this beating around the bush, slimy bullshit?


I don’t know what makes an inanimate object ugly, but the crookie captures it.


reading sideways sucks


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: