You envy the worldview in which people back their opinions with actual arguments?

I envy the worldview it's possible someone can take money from another and still maintain independence.

What's up with the straw men?

> What's up with the avalanche of straw men?

Poor quality comments lead to poor quality replies. I won't deny mine is as well.

Can you explain how openly admiring someone's idealism is of "low quality"?

Admiring? You mean your backhanded remark followed by

> Read your statement again and tell me who the pessimist is, and who is most in need of a break from the internet.

And that was to them replying to your first backhanded remark.

There was absolutely nothing backhanded about anything I said. I regret if it came across that way.

I wish you'd have elaborated on specifics and actually tried to understand, rather than telling me what I believe. I can see now you just want to be angry at someone, and I'm no longer interested in engaging with you. In any case, I'm genuinely sorry for whatever I've done to activate you, and I wish you well.

Aren't those just overengineered sanitizers?

Question is, can you sidestep or disable them in user scripts or in developer tools, without disabling CSP entirely or doing something even more invasive (and generally precluding use of that browser instance for browsing)?

We made sure to exclude WebExtensions code from web pages's Trusted Types restrictions enforcement. (Bugs can happen of course)

Where in your metaphor are the club next door using Persona instead of that implementation, and the EU's reference implementation requiring a Google Play integrity check to acquire a serial number in the first place?

Not really, I'd be impressed if my moka could spy on me, at least after the first use.

HN doesn't actually follow Markdown. There's no list syntax here, you need to start paragraphs to imitate it.

NIS 2 article 12 specifically says the CSIRT must help reporter and provider negotiate a disclosure timeline. He set a timeline because there's supposed to be a timeline.

> You cannot disclose this to public. Even with good intentions.

Bullshit, NIS 2 article 12 specifically says CSIRTs must coordinate the negotiation of a disclosure timeline between reporter and provider. I'd say offering a 30 day embargo while CC'ing the relevant CSIRT is the start of such negotiation from the reporter.

My biggest doubt about this story, LLM writing aside, is the lack of mention of a CSIRT follow up.

As opposed to emitting non-JSON tokens and having to throw away the answer?

Or just run json.dumps on the correct answer in the wrong format.

Don't shoot the messenger

Whom's messenger? You didn't point us to anyone's research.

I just don't see how sampling tokens constrained to a grammar can be worse than rejection-sampling whole answers against the same grammar. The latter needs to follow the same constraints naturally to not get rejected, and both can iterate in natural language before starting their structured answer.

Under a fair comparison, I'd expect the former to provide answers at least just as good while being more efficient. Possibly better if top-whatever selection happened after the grammar constraint.

An aside, but out of five links for Java edition one is 404 and the next one is an HTTP-only site seemingly not updated since 2009.

Funny to contrast with Bedrock edition, for which they paid for FMOD Studio to cover the audio features of those two (and more).

The commenter you're responding to a) independently made the exact same reference; b) has a username like that of Jared Leto's other Disney tentpole flop role...

Well spotted, I guess they're pushing for HN's redditification then.

Slight correction, to pretend to make money.