Pro-tip: if you are actively assisting someone in doing illegal things then you are an accomplice.

Achieving a zero-gravity environment, or a vacuum?

Ah, you’re talking about the regime that fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics because the president didn’t like the figures, right?

Right?

Very much hyperbolic about the UK. You’re fine protesting against Israel, but Palestine Action is a proscribed group (not that I agree with that!) and that will land you in trouble.

Faith Collapsing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68DJCaqEpDc

Flawless response elevated to performance art by the username.

Not a desktop thing (digital out-of-home signage) but we’re dropping Windows like it’s flaming dogshit. Minimal Linux install with X, Blackbox and player software (and management/monitoring stuff obvs) on all new assets and the thousands of extant ones will get replaced as soon as feasible.

Maybe time to ask AI why you’re looking for a technical solution rather than addressing the gaslighting that has left you with such piss-poor medical care in the richest country on earth?

Everyone knows this is a problem. No-one it effects has enough power to change it

Already know the answer, don't need AI for that one.

Maybe time to use a genuinely useful tech instead of trying to solve an actual hard problem by handwaving difficult problems?

Seems to me like the "difficult problem" is solved in pretty much every other rich country in the world.

if its not solved in the richest country maybe its not so easy to solve unless you want to hand wave the diffuclt parts and just describe it as "rich people being greedy"

It's such a dysfunctional situation that the "rich people being greedy" is the most likely explanation. Either that or the U.S. citizenry are uniquely stupid amongst rich countries.

Perhaps we should rename it as the Peninsular of North Mexico?

> Trump's a piece of work, all right.

I’ve not seen it spelled like that that before.

Any reason why they wouldn’t use EDIFACT instead?

As having implemented EDIFACT parsers and translation layers, Universal Business Language (Oasis UBL) is a bliss to work with. Yes, it's a big standard and looks scary when starting out with it, but it is very well designed for a complicated world.

Google says following:

In some member states, like Germany, the EDIFACT format, when compliant with the EN 16931 data model, is accepted as a valid e-invoice format.

EN 16931 defines what information needs to be in an invoice (the data model), while EDIFACT INVOIC defines how that information is structured and formatted for electronic transmission (the syntax).

OK, it’s been a long time since I worked in this space. Seems like it’s an XML version of the INVOIC message, but is it required to support the XML syntax, or does the plain old EDI format suffice?