I'm not sure but I thought it was funny that the "buy me a coffee" banner is the most prominent visual on the page, dwarfing the (typo'd) example text. At least that's how it appears to me on mobile.
oh okay so i had chatgpt generate the readme for me... and thats just how it came out... i dont really know how to shrink the size of the buymeacoffee banner... i didnt mean for it to be so big... i just have never done anything like this... ive never gotten so much flack from releasing a free font before... sheesh
Once upon a time a clever software engineer realized that engineering talent is the fuel which the business relies on to support its revenue growth, and management is for facilitating this process, while the CEO’s purpose is to be blamed when it doesn’t work out. He wrote a small bash script which replaced corporate leadership with a “quote of the day” generator and everyone lived happily ever after.
I think that we are currently undergoing a sort of Cambrian explosion of awful slop that will inevitably starve itself of resources and die off.
After that process completes, a small core of human-only, anti-“social”, resilient software will remain efficient and usable.
This software will serve as the foundation for a future that prioritizes efficiency (both of hardware and financial resources), maintainability, extensibility, etc.
Much of what we imagine as futuristic software features today will be tomorrow’s corny yesteryear. Tomorrow’s software will be much more utilitarian.
Unfortunately, most users will still probably be trapped in dark-patterned software like Facebook, but the ever-increasing abusiveness of such platforms for the sake of extracting profit growth from a stable or shrinking userbase will drive more and more people to the new world.
Not to worry! Microslop probably has a product in the works to replace disgruntled open-source maintainers with agreeable, high-review-throughput agentic systems.
I thought they were saying it was more efficient, as in tokens per watt. I didn’t see a direct comparison on that metric but maybe I didn’t look well enough.
GP was talking about commercially hosted LLMs running in datacenters, not free Chinese models.
Local is definitely still improving. That’s another reason the megacenter model (NVDA’s big line up forever plan) is either a financial catastrophe about to happen, or the biggest bailout ever.
5.2 is great if you ask it engineering questions, or questions an engineer might ask. It is extremely mid, and actually worse than the o3/o4 era models if you start asking it trivia like if the I-80 tunnel on the bay bridge (yerba buena island) is the largest bore in the world. Don't even get me started on whatever model is wired up to the voice chat button.
But yes it will write you a flawless, physics accurate flight simulator in rust on the first try. I've proven that. I guess what I'm trying to say is Anthropic was eating their lunch at coding, and OpenAI rose to the challenge, but if you're not doing engineering tasks their current models are arguably worse than older ones.
In addition to engineering tasks, it's an ad-free answer-box, outside of cross checking things, or browsing search results it's totally replaced Google/search engine use for me. I also pay for Kagi for search. In the last year I've been able to fully divorce myself from the google ecosystem besides gmail and maps.
According to OpenAI it's something like 4.2% of the use. But this data is from before Codex added subscription support and I think only covers ChatGPT (back when most people were using ChatGPT for coding work, before agents got good).
The execs I've talked to, they are paying for it to answer capex questions, as a sounding board for decision making, and perhaps most importantly, crafting/modifying emails for tone/content. In the bay area particularly a lot of execs are foreign with english as their second language and LLMs can cut email generation time in half.
I'd believe that but I was commenting on who actually pays for it. My guess is that most individuals using AI in their personal lives are using some sort of free tier.
I know they have said that. But it feels a bit strange to me to continue to develop in C++ then, if they eventually will have to rewrite everything in Swift. Wouldn't it be better to switch language sooner rather than later in that case?
Or maybe it doesn't have to take so much time to do a rewrite if an AI does it. But then I also wonder why not do it now, rather than wait.
That is the plan, but they are stalled on that effort by difficulties getting Swift's memory model (reference counting) to play nice with Ladybird's (garbage collection)
I think there was some work with the Swift team at Apple to fix this but there haven't been any updates in months
I know that that’s the plan, but I believe it when I see it. Mozilla invented entire language features for Rust based on Servo’s needs. It’s doubtful whether a language like Swift, which is used mostly for high-level UI code, has what it takes to serve as the foundation of a browser engine.
reply