Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | airspresso's commentslogin

You’re ignoring Jevons paradox. Everyone, both people and companies, will be making exponentially more software with these tools. Software that both needs to get created, debugged and updated to realize the intention of it. That’s what our time will be spent on as programmers.


Do you have any evidence that the demand for developers is largely price elastic?

People are already struggling to find work from oversupply of talent and not enough demand


At the same time ability to write software is exploding we are watching large entities in the market consolidated and small businesses end up on the down side of the K shaped economy. Programmers demand and pay should go down as supply increases just like every other person in an economy.


Apple has a solid hardware business and massive profits from their App Store tax, they are not dependent on ad business in the way Google is. Very different incentives.


They might not be dependent on ad revenue, but they are a greedy company that will not leave any money on the table. Next year, more ads are coming to the App Store that already generates a profit of over $10 billion/year: https://9to5mac.com/2025/12/17/apple-announces-more-ads-are-...


Sounds neat but what kind of range limits would that impose on each trip? Switching from one means of transportation to another, even if both are buses, increases the total travel time significantly. Not to mention all the hassle involved for passengers.


This 100%. It should be seen as critical infrastructure because of everything it can enable when run well.


That's how I read it XD "oh no, RL is dead too"


Sounds like you're fighting the weights. What would it take to align the setup with what the LLM expects?


Hard disagree. Python is so simple anyone can get up and running with coding in a few lines in the REPL.


Simple != easy. Rich Hickey has the details:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdOUGdseq4


Hallucinations and output quality are two different problems. Hallucinations are usually expressed in perfect sounding sentences by the LLM, that's what makes it so convincing to end users.


Yes, that's quite common.


I agree. And I also know how much of that experience comes from having a legal dept. that are collaborative and supportive of what the tech org wants to do. Which I suspect is quite rare.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: