There just as much completely unrelated to the incident in that as there is related.

Also, what guarantee is there that whomever created that document didn't just date it two days prior to acquire more funding for doing spooky things?

I don't think there's a "guarantee" that it wasn't backdated, but there isn't any evidence of that either.

Since backdating would be one of the ways to fake this, the onus lies in those that claim the prediction was legit.

That's how evidence works for extraordinary claims. Alas, scientific rigor is a harsh master.

"extraordinary claims/extraordinary evidence" isn't scientific rigor, it's adding qualifiers to make the evaluation of the claim and evidence more subjective.

It's literally how the scientific method works.

There's a reason RV is considered pseudoscience.

It speaks volumes you don't see any problem with the lack of proof that the documents weren't backdated, and get defensive when people tell you this must absolutely be ruled out if we're ever to even start considering your alleged evidence.

for all the lowercase complainers:

   document.querySelectorAll("p").forEach(p => p.textContent = p.textContent.replace(/(^\w)|([.?!]\s*\w)|( i'? )/g, m => m.toUpperCase()));

Or using CSS p:first-letter{ text-transform: capitalize;}:

  document.styleSheets[0].insertRule("p:first-letter{ text-transform: capitalize;}",document.styleSheets[0].cssRules.length);

That only works for paragraphs, not sentences.

> It is estimated that 25–90% of adults also suffered from psychological problems, including hysteria and abnormal behavior and movement. A large minority of patients described having bradyphrenia.[14]

A reminder that we can all be forced to quit when pressured.

Except, yes, they will.

Not immune, maybe, but pretty well off if they didn't buy in.

It sure is dumb. To get past your ultra-elite censoring, I replaced "dick" with "genital system".

https://llmxllm.com/is-my-genital-system-better-than-5-other...

Well, a lot of the censoring is at the LLM's end(s). Of course, I'm trying to keep it U/A instead of 18+ with whatever little I can do too. Thanks for checking it out!

Obviously, anyone can run a rudimentary classification heuristic over this and understand what its purpose is.

It has the same purpose as musk's twitter buyout, to confuse the space of objective reality, and he isn't alone in his purpose.

Epistemic dialog be damned, if it is just based on volume of text referenced.

Imagine if Musk backlinks every existing twitter thread to "grokipedia" the way that first words are done with wikipedia.

It will be a claim of "oh, its just part of the platform"

Then meta and every other evil asshole that wants to control reality will follow, until we put their heads under a guillotine.

I wouldn't buy a used dildo.

Seriously though, there are strata, like with any product. You are asking a question without enough information.

You seem like a bot harvesting information or someone surveying the space in the wrong forum.

I am not a bot. I have fixed the title.

I'd touch off my nuke to make the world a better place, and I bet you would too, right?

What does it mean to ‘touch off’?

to start a fight or violent activity, or to cause a fire or explosion [1]

1. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/touch-of...

I run a tiny local dedicated server 24/7 that consumes around 10W on average, which is about $2/mo in electricity costs where I live.

I meant the upfront cost of the machine.

I guess it depends what you consider a crime to be. Like suppression of human rights, corporal and capital punishment, and so on.